Norms to Tax Ecomm Cos May be Clarified to End Doubt

NO ROOM FOR CONFUSION DIPP will define marketplace model to ensure cos operating such platforms do not face the same taxes as brick and mortar retailers
The government is likely to issue a clarification to end the confusion over ecommerce companies that operate marketplaces, so that states do not impose taxes on them. Companies that operate such platforms–these include Flipkart, Amazon India and Snapdeal-should not face the same taxes as brick and mortar retailers, a senior government official told ET.“Only the buyer and the seller have to be taxed,“ he said. “The ecommerce company is not required to pay as such since it is only providing a platform for the transaction.“

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) has received inputs on framing ecommerce guidelines from nearly all states and is drafting a policy that will define the marketplace model to leave no room for misinterpretation, he said. This clarification became critical after Karnataka proposed tax deducted at source (TDS) of 1% as a value added levy on payments made to sellers by ecommerce companies. The concern was that this could encourage other states to imitate a move that could distort the tax structure and increase compli ance costs, thus hobbling the rapidly growing industry .

Ecommerce companies that have an inventory-based model may not be able to take advantage of the marketplace definition.

“We are trying to work out what to do with companies which hold inventory ,“ the official said. “The marketplace has to be a neutral ground which does not promote only one particular product.“

DIPP is also working on rules to allow manufacturing companies to sell goods online to give a push to the sector, a key employment generator.Ecommerce and traditional retail companies have been fretting over the hazy rules on foreign direct investment (FDI) and tax rules for the two types of businesses. India does not allow FDI in the DIPP has held several rounds of discussions with ecommerce and offline retail companies including not allow FDI in the business-to-consumer segment of ecommerce, while 100% FDI is allowed in the business-to-business segment. The marketplace model however can be run with 100% foreign investment. Snapdeal, Amazon, Flipkart and eBay among others. DIPP’s move is also directed at improving ease of doing business for emerging businesses and deregulate the sector as much as possible.

Both ecommerce and traditional retail should have the same advantages, said an expert.

“Government should open FDI in retail per se and not discriminate between online and offline to give everyone a level-playing field,“ said Arvind Singhal, chairman and managing director of retail consultant Technopak. “The regulation should not be from the point of view of investment but the way one operates.“

Source: The Economic Times

Advertisements

Author:

Neeraj; an entrepreneur & a visionary in the field of Railway, Defense & Automobiles, is a graduate in commerce and a Harvard Business School Alumni. He’s an expert in govt. liasoning & contracting and has an exceptional network & connections at both local as well as global level. He’s an expert in Market Strategy & Planning and has served number of overseas companies as an advisor/consultant. He takes a profound interest in upcoming startups & is very receptive towards ground-breaking ideas & innovations. He likes to brainstorm those ideas and if the values & philosophies matches; he is even ready to invest his resources, serve as a mentor or act as an incubator to futuristic businesses.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s